s

About Academy  |  About IRSS  |    Contact Us                                                                                                                                  ISSN (Online) : 2309-0081

International Review of
Social Sciences (IRSS)

Home     Editorial Board     Current Issue     Archive     Indexing      Call for papers     Authors Guideline      Manuscript Submission

News & Events

Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Recruitment of Reviewers. Reviewers name and affiliation will be listed on the journals webpage.
  
Saturday, July 28, 2018
IRSS Volume 6, Issue 8 has been published.
  
Saturday, July 28, 2018
IRSS Volume 6 Issue 9 will publish at the end of August 2018.
  

IRSS Citation Report

  All Since 2018
 Citation  53 07
 h-index 03 01
 i10-index 01 01

Hit Counter

Total 412177
Today's 111
Yesterday's 375

 Country Wise Counter

Academy Publication Ethics


For Reviewers

Academy of IRMBR main focus is on continous improvment of its acdemic publication quality and it has clrealy defined the reviewer guidelines for its editor and reviewers. Each and every editor/reviewer should read following guidelines before an article review. 

  • Reviewers should respond within stipulated time frame, which is two weeks for the Academy of IRMBR journals.
  • Reviewers should try to fill in all the parts of reviewers report so that a fair judgment regarding the quality of the paper can be made.
  • As review is essential step towards publication process, every reviewer is therefore supposed to be fair in reviewing.
  • Any reviewer who feels him/herself as unqualified, or not having judgment. Idea or deficit of time should inform editor promptly, so that the paper can be forwarded elsewhere.
  • The review should be objective one, and personal feelings, judgments or biasness should not affect the review and its outcomes.
  • A reviewer should not review a paper that discusses any point that might have conflict of opinion with reviewer.
  • No manuscript should be reviewed which is authored, co-authored or authored by some known person/s, in order to avoid biasness.
  • A manuscript sent for review is confidential document, so it should be treated fairly and secretly and should not be shown somewhere else.
  • Reviewers should comment on each point clearly so that the judgment regarding acceptance/rejection or changes may be made on the basis of review.
  • If reviewer notices any similarity with any other paper published in any other journal, containing same contents and that issued should be addressed to editor.
  • While reviewing the paper the reviewer must ensure the following key points 

              - Originality of the Work, 
              - Contribution to field and technical quality of research.
              - Clarity of presentation and dept of research.

Copyright © www.academyirmbr.com : 2012-18. All Rights Reserved.